Portal Home > Knowledgebase > Articles Database > pure-ftpd too many connection | david510 or any expert required
pure-ftpd too many connection | david510 or any expert required
Posted by xserverx, 09-02-2007, 08:41 PM |
I have too many connection from 202.96.5.29 through pure-ftpd :
I block this ip (202.96.5.29 ) with :
but is not blocked always I have same too many connection ?
how can I force block this Ip ??
|
Posted by cywkevin, 09-02-2007, 09:20 PM |
sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 202.96.5.29 -j DROP
try append instead of insert.
|
Posted by xserverx, 09-02-2007, 09:42 PM |
same problem
|
Posted by Dexqt, 09-02-2007, 09:57 PM |
xserverx, Instead of using iptables directly may I suggest something like APF or even CSF, use CSF if you're using cPanel as it's got a great GUI that intergates with WHM.
http://rfxnetworks.com/apf.php and http://www.configserver.com/cp/csf.html
|
Posted by david510, 09-02-2007, 11:16 PM |
Installing APF and adding the IP to the deny list will help. You can block the IP using tcp wrappers. Add the IP to the file /etc/hosts.deny as follows.
ALL : 202.96.5.29
|
Posted by xserverx, 09-03-2007, 09:05 AM |
david510 and Dexqt thank you very much
but I am using APF + BFD and I configure it for block any login failures with :
/sbin/iptables -I INPUT -s 62.68.36.70 -j DROP;route add 62.68.36.70
reject;apf -d 62.68.36.70;/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 62.68.36.70 -j DROP
for example but the Ip isn't blocked
also I have my /etc/hosts.deny is empty
can I configuer this command in my BFD for add any failuers IP to /etc/hosts.deny for example:
|
Posted by david510, 09-03-2007, 09:11 AM |
Yes, you can configure that. As a safety measure add your ISP ip or any proxy server IP to the file /etc/hosts.allow.
To block that IP, you may try this. First stop the ftp service and after that add the IP to the apf deny file (/etc/apf/deny_hosts.rules) and restart apf.
|
Posted by xserverx, 09-03-2007, 10:02 AM |
very nice david really you are the hard attitude man (f)
|
Add to Favourites Print this Article
Also Read
iotop issue (Views: 671)